Friday, July 1, 2011

5-Year ARM Falls To Historic Lows

30-year fixed vs 5-year ARM

The interest rate differential between fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgages continues to widen and has now reached historic levels.

There's never been a better time to lock an ARM.

According to Freddie Mac's weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey, homeowners in Plymouth who lock their mortgage rate today will save 129 basis points on rate, on average, by choosing a 5-year ARM as their mortgage product as compared to a 30-year fixed rate loan.

The average 30-year fixed rate is 4.51%. The average 5-year ARM rate is 3.22%.

It's the biggest interest rate spread between fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage rates in Freddie Mac's recorded history; a gap which is the result, in part, of the 5-year ARM dropping to all-time lows this week.

Rates for the 5-year ARM are even lower than during last year's historic Refi Boom.

Putting today's "spread" in action against a hypothetical $250,000 loan size, a homeowner that chooses an ARM over a fixed-rate loan would save $184.30 monthly, and would have $500 fewer closing costs.

That's a 5-year savings of $11,558 -- nearly triple what you would have saved just 2 years ago.

The main reason why today's adjustable-rate mortgages are priced so aggressively relative to comparable fixed-rate loans is that Wall Street expects the economy to drag for the next several quarters, after which it expects an acceleration. 

ARMs tend to reflect short-term expectations for the U.S. economy which is why short-term mortgage rates are dropping.  Fixed products, by contrast, take a longer view and expectations for an economic rebound are pulling fixed-rate mortgage rates up.

For now, mortgage applicants can exploit the difference -- especially those who plan to move within the next 5 years -- but adjustable-rate mortgages aren't right for everyone. ARMs carry particular risks about which you should be aware before locking.

Before you choose an ARM, therefore, talk it through with your loan officer. 

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Pending Home Sales Unexpectedly Spike In May

Pending Home SalesThe summer housing market is heating up.

According to data from the National Association of REALTORS®, the Pending Home Sales Index smashed analyst expectations, jumping 8 percent on a monthly basis in May. 

Wall Street calls were for an increase of just 0.5 percent. 

It was a surprise result that, coupled with the recent stronger-than-expected New Home Sales and Existing Home Sales readings, has sparked housing market optimism in Minnesota and nationwide.

The biggest reason for the optimism is because of what the Pending Home Sales Index measures. 

In contrast to "traditional" housing data which reports on how housing performed two months ago, for example, the Pending Home Sales Index is a forward-looking indicator; a predictor of future market activity based on freshly-written contracts between buyers and sellers.

In other words, the Pending Home Sales Index looks ahead -- not back. This is reflected in its methodology which states that 80% of homes under contract close within 2 months, and a large percentage of the rest close within Months 3 and 4.

Because May's Pending Home Sales Index rose sharply, therefore, we can expect similar jumps in the Existing Home Sales figures of June and July.

For housing and home prices, this is a positive but the gains won't apply to each home equally. The Pending Home Sales Index is still a national report for a market built on local sales. What's happening on your particular street in your particular neighborhood may not reflect what's happening somewhere else.

For accurate, real-time data in your local market, ask a real estate agent for statistics.

 

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Home Values Climb 0.8 Percent In April

FHFA Home Price Index (From Peak To Present)

Maybe homes in Maple Grove are holding value better than we thought.

Between March and April of this year, home values rose 0.8 percent nationally, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency's Home Price Index. It's the index's first month-to-month improvement since May of last year.

Values are down 19 percent since peaking 4 years ago.

Private-sector data affirms the government's report. 

Tuesday, the S&P's Case-Shiller Index also showed home values higher by 0.8 percent in April, on a monthly basis. Led by Washington, D.C. and San Francisco, 13 of the Case-Shiller's 20 tracked markets showed improvement in April. 

In March, just 2 markets did.

As a home seller , it's nice to see reports of rising home prices after multiple months of "bad news". However, the data may not be as rosy as it appears to be. National real estate surveys including the Home Price Index and the Case-Shiller Index are flawed for everyday buyers and sellers.

The biggest flaw is "age". Both the Home Price Index and the Case-Shiller Index report on a near 2-month delay.

This week, the calendar turns to July. Yet, we're still discussing housing news from April. The housing market of 60 days ago was very different from the housing market of today. Mortgage rates are different, market drivers are different, and the pool of buyers is likely different, too.

We can't discuss today's housing market with "April" in mind. The data is irrelevant.

Another flaw is that both reports are national in scope. Real estate, by contrast, is local.

When we cite the Home Price Index or the Case-Shiller Index, for example, and say "home values rose 0.8% in April", we're just giving a national average. On the local level, some markets rose by more, some rose by less, and others actually fell.

People buy homes on a specific block of a specific street in a specific neighborhood. Data for homes like that can't be captured in a national survey.

The group that gets the most value from the Home Price Index and Case-Shiller is Wall Street and policy-makers. The indices do a fair job of reporting how housing behaves as a whole, but for individuals concerned with buying and selling homes, the best place to find real-time, accurate data is from a real estate professional.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Top 25 Least Expensive U.S. Cities

25 Least Expensive U.S. Cities

A report issued Monday by the U.S. government showed core inflation rising 2.5 percent in the last 12 months for its biggest one-year gain since January 2010.

Everyday living is becoming expensive, it seems.

But there are some U.S. towns in which the cost of living remains affordable -- and downright cheap -- as compared to the national average. They're detailed in a BusinessWeek piece titled "The Cheapest 25 Cities In The U.S".

In comparing costs across 340 urban areas as compiled by the Council of Community & Economic Research, cities in Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee and Oklahoma ranked consistently high. Cities in Hawaii did not.

Take note, though. Although the BusinessWeek piece highlights inexpensive cities in which to live, a low cost of living does not necessarily correlate to a high standard of living. Cost-leader Harlingen, Texas, for example, boasts a poverty rate nearly triple the national average.

Other "Inexpensive Cities" feature similar poverty rates.

The Top 10 "cheapest cities", as shown by BusinessWeek are:

  1. Harlingen, Texas
  2. Pueblo, Colorado
  3. Pryor Creek, Oklahoma
  4. McAllen, Texas
  5. Cookeville, Tennessee
  6. Commerce-Hunt County, Texas
  7. Brownsville, Texas
  8. Fort Smith, Arkansas
  9. Muskogee, Oklahoma
  10. Springfield, Illinois

And, at the other end of the spectrum, the top 5 most expensive cities/areas were, in order, Manhattan, New York; Brooklyn, New York; Honolulu, Hawaii; San Francisco, CA; and Queens, New York.

Manhattan's cost of living is more than twice the national average.

The complete list is available at the BusinessWeek website.

Monday, June 27, 2011

What's Ahead For Mortgage Rates This Week : June 27, 2011

Fed Funds RateMortgage markets improved again last week on a revised economic outlook for the U.S. economy, and ongoing concerns about Greece and its sovereign debt.

Conforming mortgage rates in Minnesota fell last week and now hover near the all-time lows set last November.

Adjustable-rate mortgages are especially low.

There were three big stories last week that will carry forward into this week.

First, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to leave the Fed Funds Rate unchanged in its current target range of 0.000-0.250 percent. This was expected. However, the Fed revised its growth estimates for the U.S. economy lower. This was not expected.

Mortgage rates dipped on the news.

Second, Greece moved closer to avoiding insolvency. The nation-state's parliament must now pass a package of spending cuts and tax increases to appease Eurozone leaders and the IMF. Without passage, though, bankruptcy may be unavoidable.

Worries about Greece's fate sparked a bond market flight-to-quality. This, too, helped mortgage rates ease.

And, lastly, Thursday, the U.S. and other members of the International Energy Agency chose to release 60 million barrels of oil to the market over the next month. You've likely experienced the impact as the gas pump already -- gas prices are way down nationwide.

Lower gas prices means fewer inflationary pressures and inflation is the enemy of mortgage rates. Less inflation, lower mortgage rates.

This week, mortgage rates may reverse. 

There isn't much new data due for release -- inflation data due Monday, housing data due Wednesday, and a series of confidence reports throughout the week -- but there are 3 scheduled treasury auctions that could pull rates up or down.

  • Monday : 2-Year Treasury Note auction
  • Tuesday : 5-Year Treasury Note auction
  • Wednesday : 7-Year Treasury Note auction

If demand is high at any/all of the auctions, mortgage rates should drop. If demand is weak, mortgage rates should rise.